Rentoul’s ‘Blair’: “One of the best political biographies of recent times.”

Tony Blair addresses the UN General Assembly, Sept. 2005

Tony Blair addresses the UN General Assembly, Sept. 2005

John Rentoul’s Tony Blair: Prime Minister, the most astute and multi-faceted biography of Blair at the time of its last edition in 2001, is reissued in Finds this week with a 20,000-word Afterword that assesses the last six years of his premiership and subsequent political ‘afterlife’. (The ebook is on offer here.) Reviewing the 2001 edition in the Telegraph Rachel Sylvester wrote that ‘With further updates, [Rentoul's] biography will almost certainly become the definitive one.’ Naturally we’re of the view that ‘definitive’ status has now been secured, but don’t just take our word for it.

The Independent on Sunday yesterday ran a generous extract from the new pages, opening with a consideration of the actions of early 2003 that have come to define Blair’s tenure in office. Among many interested responses to that extract was that of James Forsyth, political editor of the Spectator, who took to Twitter to report that he found John’s piece ‘superb on how Blair survived post-Iraq by playing Brown with ‘as fine an understanding of psychology as anything in Jane Austen’’ (and that he was also ‘intrigued by Cherie’s view that [her husband] could take a 51-49 decision and then make the case for it as if it was 70-30.’) Forsyth then offered the crowning verdict that Tony Blair: Prime Minister is ‘one of the best political biographies of recent times.’

Here is the thought-provoking opening to the Independent on Sunday extract:

“Given that Blair’s response to 9/11 led in a straight line to Britain’s taking part in the invasion of Iraq 18 months later, and given that the Iraq war was the main reason Blair did not continue as Prime Minister for longer, solidarity with America – or, rather, solidarity with President Bush and meaning it – was a political error. Certainly, it is possible to see how a more cynical politician might have mitigated the anti-war rage by stepping back from military deployment in March 2003, an option explicitly offered by President Bush and described, but not, he says, advocated, by Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, on the eve of conflict. It would have made little difference in Iraq, as the American forces would have gone in anyway, with the British presumably joining them afterwards, when the UN endorsed the international administration of the country in May 2003. But it would have made a difference in British politics…”

Posted in Appreciations, Biography, Reissues | Tagged , , , , ,

Come in Dr Johnson, your time is up…

johnson_samuelBelatedly, many thanks to all those who entered our prize quiz to win one complete set of Dr Johnson’s 3-volume Lives of the Poets. It was a fine thing to see so many people so quick off the mark in their correct answer to the queries we set.

To recap, we asked you to identify the three poets of whom Johnson wrote in the following three extracts from the Lives:

1. “[His] delight was to sport in the wide regions of possibility; reality was a scene too narrow for his mind. He sent his faculties out upon discovery, into worlds where only imagination can travel, and delighted to form new modes of existence, and furnish sentiment and action to superior beings, to trace the counsels of hell, or accompany the choirs of heaven…”

The netherwordly/celestial reference will have tipped a wink that it is JOHN MILTON being described thus.

2. “He was contented to be called an Irishman by the Irish; but would occasionally call himself an Englishman. The question may, without much regret, be left in the obscurity in which he delighted to involve it.”

Of course the Irish Sea has more than once made an intriguing bridge/division in the classification of what we try to call ‘English Literature’; but the man referred to here is JONATHAN SWIFT.

3. “… with an avowed contempt of all decency and order, a total disregard of every moral, and a resolute denial of every religious obligation, he lived worthless and useless, and blazed out his youth and his health in lavish voluptuousness…”

The tendency of Poets Behaving Badly has been a great blessing to literary biography, but some poets have exceeded others in that line, and few more extravagantly than this man: John Wilmost, the second EARL OF ROCHESTER.

Those were the answers then, and the first correct set drawn from our cat’s basket was from Christa Fleps, who wins the spoils. Congratulations to Christa and, again, thanks to all entrants.

Posted in Appreciations, Miscellaneous, Reissues | Tagged , , , , , ,

Johnson’s ‘Lives of the Poets’ may be yours…

'They're GIVING it away!? Why, I was paid but 200 guineas for the whole...'

‘They’re GIVING it away!? Why, I was paid but 200 guineas for the whole…’

‘Most literary criticism is ephemeral,’ Colin Burrow opined for the LRB, ‘too good for wrapping up chips but not worth binding, keeping, annotating or editing. Very little English literary criticism has lasted as long or worn as well as Samuel Johnson’s ‘Lives of the Poets’…’

It was never meant to be the grandest of productions – not in 1777, when Johnson was commissioned by a booksellers’ consortium to write prefaces for a raft of fifty-plus discrete editions of English poets. But in Johnson’s hands the commission acquired weight, he wound up spending four years over the task, and finally a free-standing work emerged – one that remains stalwart and full of pleasures today, 300 or so years from Johnson’s birth.

As John Mullan wrote in the Guardian a while back, ”The Lives of the Poets’, combining mournfully droll biography with brilliant literary criticism, is as enjoyable as anything [Johnson] wrote, yet has long been unavailable outside academic libraries or second-hand bookshops.’

Yet no sooner had Mullan written same in 2009 than Finds was offering George Birkbeck Hill’s three-volume edition. And if you should like to have a chance to win the full set of three for your own shelves you have only to do two things by way of entry:

i. Correctly identify the three poets of whom Johnson is writing in the following three extracts from the LIVES:

1. “[His] delight was to sport in the wide regions of possibility; reality was a scene too narrow for his mind. He sent his faculties out upon discovery, into worlds where only imagination can travel, and delighted to form new modes of existence, and furnish sentiment and action to superior beings, to trace the counsels of hell, or accompany the choirs of heaven…”

2. “He was contented to be called an Irishman by the Irish; but would occasionally call himself an Englishman. The question may, without much regret, be left in the obscurity in which he delighted to involve it.”

3. “… with an avowed contempt of all decency and order, a total disregard of every moral, and a resolute denial of every religious obligation, he lived worthless and useless, and blazed out his youth and his health in lavish voluptuousness…”

Update 10.06.2013: This competition has now closed.

Posted in Appreciations, Reissues | Tagged , , , , ,

Works of H.G. Wells, freely distributed

'Faber Finds, eh? Whatever next...?'

‘Faber Finds, eh? Whatever next…?’

Last month we offered a selection of titles from the oeuvre of H.G. Wells as reissued in Finds livery, the prizes contingent upon the correct answering of a pair of posers:

Q. Wells had an extramarital affair – and conceived a son – with which English novelist and journalist (herself the subject of a biography by Victoria Glendinning in Finds)?
A. Rebecca West
Q. Men Like Gods (1923) is believed to have inspired the writing (in riposte) of which famous dystopian novel of 1932?
A. Huxley’s Brave New World

Our winners were drawn out of the time machine as follows:

The Wheels of Chance – James Beeson
The Food of the Gods – Scott Varnham
The Passionate Friends – Claire Fitzgerald
Bealby – Nick Larter
Boon – Andrew Frayn
Men Like Gods – Leanne Bucknall
The World of William Clissold – James Morrison

Congrats to them and warm thanks to all who entered!

Posted in Reissues | Tagged , ,

The Great H.G. Wells Giveaway

H.G. Wells

Call it a rite of spring, call it a fit of magnanimity, call it, if you wish, an urge to clear some space around the desk – but the moment has come for another grand old Finds Giveaway. There are quite a few titles by quite a few authors which we feel moved to offer you the chance to sample gratis. (Your side of the bargain, dear reader, should you be a lucky winner, is just to keep spreading the good word about good books…)

We indicated some weeks (months!?) ago that we wanted to offer some of our striking range of titles by H.G. Wells. That time is nigh, for starters. We have one copy of each of the following to give away:

The Wheels of Chance (1896)
The Food of the Gods (1904)
The Passionate Friends (1913)
Bealby (1915)
Boon (1915)
Men Like Gods (1923)
The World of William Clissold (1926, N.B. in three volumes, the prize being all three)

For a chance to win the title of your choice, you have to do two things.

1. Answer these 2 questions correctly:
(i) Wells had an extramarital affair – and conceived a son – with which English novelist and journalist (herself the subject of a biography by Victoria Glendinning in Finds)?
(ii) Men Like Gods (1923) is believed to have inspired the writing (in riposte) of which famous dystopian novel of 1932?

UPDATE: This competition is now closed.

Posted in Appreciations, Miscellaneous, Reissues | Tagged , ,

Back in the headlines: the heroines of Anne Sebba’s ‘Battling For News’

Anne Sebba

A nice succinct write-up by Lesley McDowell in last weekend’s Independent on Sunday of our re-reissue of Anne Sebba’s history of female war reporters BATTLING FOR NEWS, newly updated so as to discuss the death of the Sunday Times’ Marie Colvin in Homs, Syria, the awful assault on CBS News’s Lara Logan in Tahrir Square, Cairo, et cetera:

“Faber is to be applauded for re-releasing this superb 1994 history of women reporters through its Faber Finds series… with Sebba’s new preface, highlighting particularly the appalling case of Lara Logan, sexually assaulted by a crowd while covering the uprising in Cairo.

Marie Colvin in Iraq in 2007

Sebba’s history of women reporting abroad is a more positive one, though, tracing the careers of journalistic stars including Martha Gellhorn and Rebecca West, as well as the less well-known but no less heroic Clare Hollingworth (who used her smaller size to good effect to help squeeze through a crowd to a much-needed phone box), and Peggy Hull, the only woman to “approach professional recognition” during the First World War, when female reporters were not allowed accreditation.”

Posted in Appreciations, Miscellaneous, Reissues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Into battle, through the looking glass: Richard Skinner on Keith Douglas’s ‘Alamein to Zem Zem’

Richard Skinner

Since our inception in 2008 Finds has been proud to publish Alamein to Zem Zem, Keith Douglas’s prose account of his experiences on the desert battlefield of World War II. The huge interest in this title has testified to the enduring fascination readers have with this exceptional, enigmatic writer: one of the great war poets who also excelled as a fighting man. One notable admirer is Richard Skinner, acclaimed novelist (The Red Dancer, The Velvet Gentleman, The Mirror) and director of the fiction programme at the Faber Academy writing school; and we’re delighted to welcome Richard here as a guest blogger on the subject of Douglas’s book, a work that has a deep familial significance for him on top of its many great merits.

RICHARD SKINNER writes:
My grandfather, Captain Alexander Greig, served in North Africa during the Second World War. He fought in the battle of El Alamein with the 8th Army, one of the divisions affectionately known as the ‘Desert Rats’. I have a picture of him in uniform sitting on a camel. My grandfather died when I was a small child and I don’t remember him, but every time we visited my Nana, I would look at his small collection of books that she kept in a locked glass cabinet. These books were mostly about Rommel, and my Nana told me that my grandfather always expressed enormous respect for the German field marshal. Ever since then, the word ‘Alamein’ has had a tremendous significance in my family.

Keith Douglas

So, when I came across a copy of ‘Alamein to Zem Zem’ in a secondhand bookshop more than 20 years ago, I immediately bought it. I knew of and loved Keith Douglas the poet, but had no idea he had written a memoir of his wartime experiences. And what a stunning memoir it is – written immediately after the events it depicts. Douglas’ prose is lucid and direct and sounds so fresh that it feels as though it could have been written yesterday. It is entirely free of that kind of dated English language we now associate with contemporary works such as Waugh’s ‘Brideshead Revisited’ or David Lean’s film of Noel Coward’s ‘Brief Encounter’.

As well as being the finest English poet to emerge from the Second World War, Douglas was also a talented graphic artist and he possessed an artist’s mix of detachment and curiosity, which meant that he could get up, close and personal to the horrors of the war without flinching. His memoir is full of the most incredible drawings and linguistic images: ‘Every man had a white mask of dust in which, if he wore no goggles, his eyes showed like a clown’s eyes.’ Laying down to sleep out in the cold desert night, he describes the lights in the sky as ‘starshells, tracers of orange, green, blue, and a harsh white, and the deeper colour of explosions.’

His account is also very good at capturing the physical sensations of being in battle. A few hours before his first engagement, he describes his feelings as the ‘unstable lightness which is felt physically immediately after putting down a heavy weight.’ The view from his moving tank he says is like ‘a camera obscura or a silent film … which led me to feel that the country into which we were now moving was a strange land, quite unrelated to real life, like the scenes in ‘The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari’.’

Keith Douglas was born on 24 January 1920 and was fascinated by all things military as a child, perhaps because his absent father had been an army captain during the First World War. He went to Christ’s Hospital school and later read English & History at Oxford. He was impulsive, precocious and developed a profound disregard for authority, resulting in a near expulsion from Christ’s Hospital over a stolen training rifle. His antipathy towards the establishment continued at Oxford, where he wrote vehemently anti-war poems. And yet, as soon as war broke out, he joined the Sherwood Rangers as a cavalry officer. This contradiction was typical of Douglas’ complex nature.

After an administrative spell with the Sherwood Rangers in Palestine, Douglas was sent back to England for more training. He was desperate for the experience of war and so, against direct orders, he famously made his own way back to North Africa. His unit was now in theatre and he rejoined them in October 1942. No one immediately seemed to notice his absence and Douglas remained in the Middle East with the Sherwood Rangers until 1943, when he returned to England to retrain for the D-Day invasions. On 6 June 1944, Douglas took part in the main assault on the Normandy beaches. Three days later, he was killed by mortar fire near Tilly-sur-Seulles while returning from a patrol. He was just 24 years old.

The war for Douglas was a Nietzschean self-examination of willpower and endurance and he mentions several times that his reasons for joining up were not just ideological, but also highly personal. As a soldier, he was passionate, uncompromising—the kind of person you would want as a leader in wartime. As his batman said to him, ‘I like you sir. You’re shit or bust, you are.’

As in his poems, there is a meditation on the metaphysical that runs throughout the book, almost as though he were a criminal, feeling for his own pulse whilst in the middle of a crime. Death was, for Douglas, a moment of transformation. He describes his experiences in this beautiful memoir as like ‘having walked through the looking-glass which touches a man entering a battle.’ My grandfather would have concurred, I’m sure.

Posted in Appreciations, Miscellaneous, Reissues | Tagged , , , , ,

The Sandman cometh: the ‘splendidly macabre’ (also ‘comic’) achievements of Miles Gibson

Miles Gibson

A word here to mark the arrival upon the Finds list of the multifariously gifted Miles Gibson: newly in our livery is The Sandman (1984), to follow in consecutive months are Dancing with Mermaids and Kingdom Swann, all of which have been augmented by brand new prefaces from Mr Gibson himself.

Miles’ presence on the web takes many and varied forms. But this is only as befits a writer who has been favourably compared to, inter alia, Ian McEwan (in the FT), Garcia Marquez (in Country Life), Poe (the United Press), Swift (the Sydney Morning Herald), Mervyn Peake (the Literary Review), Martin Amis (the TLS), Dylan Thomas (the Evening Standard), Evelyn Waugh (the Observer) and even David Lynch (Time Out). I can assure you that you will enjoy the chase if, Alice-like, you venture down the electronic rabbit-hole in pursuit of his fugitive shade.

The official Miles Gibson website with extended details of both his writings and artworks is here. His ‘The Author Notes’ blog – which he has described to me as ‘nothing but mischief’, and which I can’t recommend highly enough – is here. And his fabulous Tumblr page of hand-inked collage-postcards is here.

Let us say a little, then, of Gibson’s notorious Sandman – one William Burton by name, who is seen to grow up in a small hotel in a shabby English seaside town, lonely and inclined to practise conjuring tricks. Fully grown he turns to magic of a darker kind, and takes to walking abroad at night, predatory, on the streets of London.

Should you be afraid – very afraid? By no means. The TLS hailed the novel for its ‘comic impact’ as achieved by ‘the deftness of Gibson’s control.’ (Cosmopolitan, too, rated it ‘horribly deft’!) Time Out thought it ‘a splendidly macabre achievement’, the Sydney Morning Herald felt it was ‘written by a virtuoso.’

As Miles reflects in his new preface to the novel in Finds: “I hadn’t intended to shock the reader with a eulogy for a serial killer. I’d created a monster, perhaps, but like any proud parent I’d loved him enough to forgive his crimes and misdemeanours and felt comfortable enough in his company to regard the narrative as a lament for a lost soul, an erotic fantasy, a pitch-black comedy…”

Keep ‘em peeled for a chance to win a copy of The Sandman in our next big prize quiz, coming soon…

Posted in Appreciations, Reissues | Tagged , , , ,

Peter Hobbs hails R.C. Hutchinson and his ‘brave, compassionate, moral’ novel ‘A Child Possessed’

Peter Hobbs

It’s our great pleasure today to offer a guest post, in praise of one of the finest novelists to have been reissued by Finds, by one of the best British novelists at work today, no less. Peter Hobbs has been justly praised for his superb novels The Short Day Dying (2006) and In the Orchard, The Swallows (2013), also for his story collection I Could Ride All Day in My Cool Blue Train. Here he pays his tribute to Ray Coryton Hutchinson (1907-1975), five of whose novels have been reissued by Finds, Peter’s special favourite being A Child Possessed (1964).


I’ve always found it strange how the reputations of so many writers have very little to do with the quality of their work. It can take many decades before there’s a levelling out or reappraisal. In the short and medium terms weak writers may be lauded, and great writers forgotten. RC Hutchinson seems to have been in the latter category – he’s almost unknown amongst writers of my generation or younger. He died in 1975, the same year he was shortlisted for the Booker Prize for his final novel, Rising. Over most of the years since his books have been out of print and hard to find, and the only way you would even come across his name was through the route by which great, almost-forgotten writers usually endure – word of mouth.

R.C. Hutchinson

My introduction to his work came via a conversation with the novelist Charles Chadwick, who was so insistent I should read it that he later sent me his own old hardback of the 1964 novel, A Child Possessed. It arrived in the post with a letter from Charles saying how fond he was of the copy, and how if possible he’d love to get it back at some stage. I understood that it was one of those books that are simply loved by their owner, and that there was no small amount of pain involved in sending it off in the post. But still he was so passionate about the book and its importance that he was willing to risk entrusting it to me for a while. I’ve been grateful ever since.

A Child Possessed is an extraordinary book. It tells the story of Stepan, a Russian of aristocratic birth, who since becoming estranged from his wife Helene has been working in France as a lorry driver. By chance he discovers that Helene has kept hidden from him the fact that their daughter Eugenie, who was severely mentally and physically disabled and who he has long believed to be dead, is alive, in the secluded care of a Swiss hospital. Stepan visits her, and despite the level of care she clearly requires, he feels instantly that she should not be kept there, away from her family. In an act of love, at once instinctive and certain, he takes her into his own care, bringing her into his life, and taking her with him on his long road journeys.

It is a startlingly brave book to write, quiet and deeply human, a compassionate and fierce love story. It is certainly one of the great British novels of the 20th century, beautifully written, and is perhaps the most moral – though certainly not moralising – book I know. And as Charles Chadwick commented, after I had read (and returned) the book: on learning that Hutchinson himself had a severely disabled child, it seems an even braver, more remarkable work to have produced.

Great writing is often far from where the publishing noise is, and where the headlines are, and sometimes it can get lost for a while. But it tends to find its way, at least to people who care for it.

Posted in Appreciations, Reissues | Tagged , , , , , , ,

Margaret Thatcher & the turn of the ratchet

‘To Margaret Thatcher, Thrice- elected ‘illiberal Tory’…’ Thus did Andrew Roberts dedicate his magisterial 1999 biography of Salisbury (available in Finds), following the Marquess’s own self-definition from his schooldays onward. And in this way did the esteemed historian Roberts advertise his own sympathies in terms of both past and present. Roberts obviously loved Salisbury to have written 938pp in his honour, and must also have felt some deep sympathy for the thrice-PM’s imperishable formulations of the Conservative mindset. ‘Whatever happens will be for the worse,’ Salisbury wrote in 1887, ‘and therefore it is in our interest that as little should happen as possible.’ (He further advised a niece of his that the ‘use of Conservatism’ was to ‘delay changes until they became harmless.’)

What of the changes wrought by Margaret Thatcher in her three terms of office? She is an emblem of Conservative electoral success, having done more than her share to have kept the Tories in government for over two-thirds of the twentieth century. But then their reputation as a pragmatic election-winning machine, the ‘natural party of government’, hardly survived her famous departure from Downing Street.

And there is an argument – you will have heard it in the last 24 hours, no? – that Thatcher’s radicalism, her overturning and undermining of traditions and institutions, her championship of the market, her rolling back of the state, her smashing of the unions, her invention of popular property-owning Toryism – that all of this tumultuous activity left not very much for the Tories to preserve, and thus define themselves by. ‘We shall probably not know until she has gone’, Peter Pulzer wrote in the LRB, ‘whether Mrs Thatcher was an erratic episode, a mutant, a comet-like irruption, or a genuine revolutionary who left as lasting a stamp on the political landscape as Peel, Joseph Chamberlain or Lloyd George.’

Pulzer was reviewing Robert Blake’s standard history The Conservative Party from Peel to Thatcher in its 1985 reissue. That work began life as ‘…to Churchill’, an expanded and revised version of the Ford Lectures Blake delivered at Oxford in 1968. The final revision made before Blake’s death, published in 1997, is The Conservative Party from Peel to Major, and it too is available in Finds. On his death Blake was described by the Independent as ‘the chronicler and custodian of British Conservatism’, and you can expect to find his opinion of Margaret Thatcher’s premierships to be uncommonly well informed from a position of considerable sympathy. ‘She was determined to turn the ratchet her way’, Blake wrote, ‘and she has.’

As you will also have noticed in the last 24 hours, Thatcher’s turns of the ratchet were not universally popular and often, in the mildest possible use of a politically necessary term, ‘divisive.’ A must-read account of one such great division in our recent history is Anthony Barnett’s Iron Britannia, a work first written in the heat of polemic back in 1983 amid the wake of the Falklands War. Its 2012 reissue in Finds is supplemented by an extensive new essay by Barnett looking back on Thatcher’s particular contribution to the rhetoric of ‘Churchillism’, and dissecting post-Falklands UK foreign policy.

May the current debates continue…

Posted in Appreciations, Biography, Reissues | Tagged , , , , , ,